Pages

Friday, January 11, 2013

Post 7- Daniel Pink and Motivational School Leadership Part 5: What does work? Purpose



                

                Peter Senge says that “Few, if any, forces in human affairs are as powerful as shared vision.”  In education, we often refer to shared vision as the mission and vision of the school.  Senge added, “Shared vision is not an idea, but a force in people’s hearts.”  He also points out that “People begin to see [the shared vision] as if it exists.”
                I’ve worked with many schools on creating or updating their mission and vision and I have a couple of warnings, a suggestion, and an un-suggestion (if you allow me to make up such a word).  The warning is a practice that I’ve seen in many schools and early in my consulting career, I encouraged this as well.  The warning is to avoid trying to create a new vision too soon or too suddenly.  A shared vision is something that evolves over a period of many years with teachers gradually enrolling as the vision begins to correlate better with their experiences or “stories that we tell ourselves” (as Kerry Patterson in Crucial Conversations calls it).  Senge lists several strategies to enroll teachers in a vision including: 1) Be enrolled yourself (live the vision) 2) Be honest about your vision (don't exaggerate the results)  3) Don't try to force people to follow the vision, it'll never work.
                According to Peter Senge, creating a shared vision begins with the leader creating their own personal vision, sharing it, living it, and ensuring that their goals, words, priorities, and policies all align with it.  This alone could take a matter of years.  Then, it’s a matter of enrolling the leadership team, the faculty, the students, the parents, and the community in that vision.  This can also take a matter of years.  The mistake that I see is a principal’s first faculty meeting at a new school, breaking out the “Let’s rewrite the school’s mission statement.”  It’ll never work.
                I was invited to one school where the principal was in the middle of enrolling teachers in his vision.  His vision was that every student graduate from high school with the opportunity to get a college degree and that the racial graduation and college-going gap was completely unacceptable.  So, we collected the data for his school and planned a series of activities for the next few faculty meetings to put a face on the achievement gap at his school.  First, we had an economics professor come from the local university and speak about the future of students who drop out, graduate high school, or get a college degree.  It does no good to talk about graduation and college if teachers haven’t considered the fate of those who do not graduate.  We spent several meetings addressing this part of the question since the reason I was working with the school was their low graduation rate. 
                Then we culminated by inviting 100 students to come to a faculty meeting.  We had used the district student information system to find out at what point students dropped out of the system.  For this example, I’m giving the numbers as I remember them and they may not be perfect.  We had someone calling out grade levels and we had instructed the students when to step out of the circle as the grades were called out.  We found that less than 1 in 100 students drop out in grades k-5, so things were looking good so far.  By 6th grade, we had 1 in 100 students dropping out, 2 more in 7th grade, and 2 more in 8th grade.  By the end of middle school, there were already 5 students in the dropout circle.  We paused here to point out that statistically, 3 out of 5 of these students were Hispanic, 1 was African American, and 1 was white.  All 5 qualified for free and reduced-price lunch.  By 9th grade, another 9 students left the circle.  In 10th grade, another 8 left and moved to the dropout circle.  We now had 22 students in the dropout circle and 78 left in the school circle.  In 11th grade, another 8 left the circle and in 12th grade, another 4 left.  There were now 34 in the dropout circle and 66 in the school circle.  That was more than half in the dropout circle and it was a powerful visual.  We stopped here with statistics about the demographics of each of the groups.  This was that point at which I saw the first tear roll down a teacher’s cheek. 
                Teachers had an idea what percentage of graduates went on to college, but that percentage was of those who made it to the end of 12th grade, not the total number.  Of the 66 remaining in the circle, 12 went on community college and moved to the community college circle.  16 went to the university circle.  The other 38 moved to the dropout circle.  We couldn’t go year-by-year in college, so we fast-forwarded 2 years.  Half of the community college students failed to complete a degree or transfer to a university, so 6 community college students moved to the dropout circle.  Of the 16 university students, 4 had not completed one year of credits in two years and moved to the dropout circle.  By the end of four years, 2 community college students moved to the associate’s degree circle and 2 moved to the university circle.  There were now 14 students in the university circle and 84 in the dropout circle.  Of these, 9 completed a bachelor’s degree and 5 moved to the dropout circle.
                In the end, we had 2 associate’s degrees, 9 bachelor’s degrees, and 89 “dropouts.”  Again, we discussed the demographics and the likely future of those 89 students who never achieved a college degree.  Here, I saw a least three teachers with tears streaming.  For the next several meetings, we had a series of student speakers share their stories with the faculty from those who overcame gigantic obstacles to those with infinite unfulfilled potential. 
Not until after all of this did we even begin to approach the re-writing of the school’s mission and vision.  Even then, we did not have unanimity in our goal for students.
The worst attempt that I ever saw at coming to a shared vision was the principal who had teachers compete to see who could write down in 2 minutes the most reasons why students weren’t successful.  He then went on a tirade about how these were all excuses and had each teacher put their list of “excuses” through a shredder.  I had the pleasure (read in a sarcastic voice) of presenting right after this activity and the mumbles and grumbles about the excuses in the shredder continued for hours.
Doc Searles of UC Santa Barbara and Harvard pointed out that one reason that Walmart outperforms K-mart so greatly is the shared vision of “Everyday Low Prices.”  Walt Disney had a vision of creating the first feature length cartoon that spread slowly and the Disney Corporation is now worth $68 Billion.  Martin Luther King Jr. changed the trajectory of the country by enrolling the masses in his vision of equality.  At my office, every single employee knows that our shared vision is “Extraordinary Service.”

What benefit could be realized by creating a shared vision at your school?  How will you do it?  What have you already done?  Share your ideas in the comments section.
Here’s a video of Daniel Pink answering the question, “After all you’ve learned, what do you think is the most critical attribute for a leader today?”



Read Part 1 of this blog here
Read Part 2 of this blog here
Read Part 3 of this blog here
Read Part 4 of this blog here

Read Part 6 of this blog here
Tags:  motivation, teacher, shared mission, vision, principal, school leadership, influence, Michael Horton, Mike Horton

No comments:

Post a Comment